Posted on 26 August 2010 at 17:09h

Two thirds of people living in the UK cannot name a single female scientist either living or historical. For 18-24 year olds this figure rises to 88%. These shocking figures from a recent survey by the Royal Society are also depressing as they reveal that only 50% of the population could name any scientist, male or female. Most who could, named Einstein. The figures are only for Britain but I wonder if they are true for other countries too?

Assuming this is a worldwide phenomenon (as opposed to a uniquely British problem) it raises many important issues. One of the concerns I have about our current IB Chemistry syllabus is that apart from the discovery of penicillin (assuming you do Option D) it contains no historical references and in a sense it is devoid of the culture of Chemistry. How can we expect our students to know of famous scientists if we do not refer to them in our teaching? There will soon be a new generation of Chemistry teachers who, unless they have done their own research, will be seriously lacking in any knowledge of the background of our subject.

The lack of knowledge of famous female chemists is a slightly different problem. Unlike their male counterparts there simply are not very many. When I was drawing up my Chemistry quotations that appear on the side of each page I was struck by difficult it is to find any by women. Off hand, how many famous female chemists can you think of?  The Royal Society has produced a list of ten famous British female scientists. Only four of them were involved in Chemistry. Three of these made their name in crystallography: Kathleen Lonsdale (1903-1971) crystal structures of inorganic and organic molecules, Dorothy Hodgkin (1910-1994) structure of penicillin and vitamin B12 and Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958) structure of DNA. The fourth was Elsie Widdowson (1908-2000) a nutritional chemist. Perhaps the most famous female chemist worldwide is Marie Curie (1867-1934) who won two Nobel Prizes (one for Physics and one for Chemistry) for her pioneering work on radioactivity. The only other famous female chemist that springs readily to my mind without doing any further research is the Canadian Maud Menten (1879-1960) who worked on enzyme kinetics. It is perhaps not surprising that there are very few famous women scientists from more than 100 years ago as many of the universities and scientific professions and societies were closed to women. However for many decades now women have had more or less equal rights to education and to the professions in most parts of the world. When I look back at the numbers of students I have taught IB Chemistry to over the past thirty years I estimate that slightly more than half were female and this ratio is also true for the teacher participants who have attended the many Chemistry IB workshops I have run.  Women are certainly studying and teaching Chemistry but somehow they are either not making as much impact as men or their achievements are going unrecognised. There is certainly some truth in this last statement as many people have re-evaluated the work of Rosalind Franklin and feel that she deserved the Nobel Prize in 1962 for elucidating the structure of DNA just as much as Watson, Crick and Wilkins. I think that all teachers of IB Chemistry need to be aware of this problem. There is a lack of role models from the past – somehow it needs to be changed for the future.

Tags: , ,

 

Comments

Post a comment about the contents of this page. To post comments you need to log in. If it is your first time you will need to subscribe.

Help us to maintain the site: If you find any bugs - such as broken links, downloads failures, or typos - please report a problem to our support team. (Do not use the comment field above to report problems.)

Tag Cloud

Recent Posts

Atmospheric CO2 passes 400 ppm

IB Chemistry teacher in the news

Destroying your old hard drive

Problems with omega-6

A problem with scandium

A dangerous stimulant?

A seven subject IB Diploma?

Errors in books and websites

Liquid nitrogen

Reducing air pollution

Gender bias in teaching

Threat to the heuristic method.

A golden bullet

Looking into the future

Is IB chemistry too easy?

Nanosponges

Origin of the moon

The EE viva voce

More on the new curriculum

A young chemist

Promoting the IB

Poisonous clothes

2011 roundup

Global skills

Curriculum review progress

Paraquat

Peer reviewed articles

Failing Extended Essays

E = m(c + a little bit)2

Chemistry/Art/IT project

Chemistry, economics and mnemonics

Hydrogen bonding

Bodyscanners

A novel use for biscuits

Teaching with ketamine

Getting hold of chemicals

'Chemistry man'

Falling life expectancy

IB May Chemistry exams

Cows' farts

Chemical passwords

Alcohol in the body

Isocyanic acid

Tech-savvy generation

Hookah pipes

IT and workshops

Illiterate chemists

Vacant seats on planes

Early X-rays

Diamond chemotherapy

Perfect cup of coffee

Cannabis & mental illness

Electronic marking

A mole of information

Thinking critically

Curriculum review

A-Levels 'not fit for purpose'

The spice of life?

Real (as opposed to virtual) chemistry

Multiple choice answers

Relevant environmental chemistry?

Anyone for tennis?

International Year of Chemistry

Syllabus content

Atomic masses change

Practical work and assessment

World's smallest Periodic Table?

Blue light cystoscopy

Explosives

Sticky tape & a pencil

How 'International' is IB Chemistry?

Women in Chemistry

Agricultural chemistry - an option?

Objective 3?

Isotopes in teeth

Chemistry & politics

Fish oil

Plant food or drug?

Developments in MRI